COPAC playing a dangerous game.
Image courtesy of Zimpapers Archives |
The Constitutional Select Committe (COPAC) is
playing with the people of Zimbabwe. It has emerged (from The Herald (23/02/12) that 70% of the information
in the draft constitution was not solicited from the people. Mind you, the
drafters should not add or subtract anything what is needed is a people-driven
constitution, not a drafters’ Constitution. This is very disappointing. But did
they really expect to get away with such unfathomable treachery?
One clause
of this draft constitution mentioned that a presidential candidate is limited
to a maximum of two terms in office and has to be less than 70 years old. It is
worth noting that this clause was crafted by the drafters themselves. Both
terms disqualified President Mugabe. It’s a well-known fact that President
Mugabe is ZANU-PF’s chief candidate, and they were not going to sit around and
watch their party being destroyed at their wake. The clause has since been
rectified, and the qualification of the presidential candidate has to be over
40 years and may serve 2-5 terms. So all this draft clause did was waste
precious time which could have been used to discuss more critical issues.
The
constitution is supposed to pave way free and fair elections. But how can this
ever be possible when the constitution itself is formulated under refutable circumstances?
Such power games and low blows by the political entities are the last thing
that Zimbabweans need. It does not always have to be a win/lose situation with
regards to politics, but a win/win atmosphere is possible when there is
compromise and the rights of Zimbabweans are put in the fore front.
I however
applaud Copac for the clause concerning media rights and freedom of speech. I
hope it will improve the media’s role in enforcing democracy in Zimbabwe.
COPAC guys might sound ruddy but for now i think there are trying to employe suitable conventional tools that might stamina ZANU PF. The action might seem to be super for now for them however in the long run general populace will be on the receiving end.
ReplyDeleteI disagree!! These tools as you call them are neither suitable nor conventional. Where is fair play and objectivity?!
ReplyDelete